For instance, he does when he depicts the, "Negro and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same schools." Finally, Martin Luther King Jr. uses parallelism within his own reflection to evoke emotions in his audience to show that . This essay was written by a fellow student. The idea of nonviolence is much larger than ordinary people see. The rhetoric helps prove how the poor lived worse in the, King, a supporter of President Lyndon B. Johnson and his Great Society, became concerned about U.S. involvement in Vietnam. Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam A Time To Break Silence analytical essay Martin Luther King Jr.'s speech "Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence", he used a variety of techniques to reinforce the argument and persuasiveness of the American involvement in the Vietnam War. Dr. King genuinely believes that the war is in direct opposition to the teachings of Christ and therefore the church must speak out in a united voice against it. The line, "For the sake of those boys, for the sake of this government, for the sake of the hundreds of thousands trembling under our violence, I cannot be silent," demonstrates how King uses parallelism. The fact that young black men are being sent [across the world] to fight for the liberties in Southeast Asia, which they [have] not found in Georgia and East Harlem questions the validity of Americas founding principles of the unalienable rights of every individual; life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. It allows them to imagine what might happen if America were to keep fighting in the war. By claiming that the United States, the greatest purveyor of violence, prefers, massive doses of violence to solve its problems, King effectively establishes the U.S. government as the pervasive wrongdoer. To help his audience see that Vietnam is only madness, a wastage of resources and an ignorance of more pressing concerns, King once again affirms that war was never a means of peace. He changes his tone from passive to passionate. Copyright 2023 IPL.org All rights reserved. His first reasons are all about practicality. (These links will automatically appear in your email.). Likewise, the image of men, both black and while, in brutal solidarity burning the huts of a poor village, helps establish the war in Vietnam as a complete disaster and atrocity. Acting almost as a climax, King lyrically urges his audience to voice their opinions and wage a war against this unjustified war in Vietnam. To construct a clear and strong picture and show how condemnable the war exercises in Vietnam were, King compared it with an arena of gladiators which even if it amuses and engages, is something absolutely animal and barbaric. By claiming that the United States, "the greatest purveyor of violence," prefers, "massive doses of violence to solve its problems," King effectively establishes the U.S. government as the pervasive wrongdoer. It also uses a bit of strong imagery. The speaker comments, that they wander into the hospitals with at least twenty casualties from American firepower for one Vietcong-inflicted injury. He shows a strong theme of determination, along with dedication, and perseverance. His use of diction and imagery arouses anger while increasing his credibility since he criticizes the unjust war he describes. However, his speech is not filled entirely with only emotionally charged words and phrases or just with pictures of war and destruction or poverty. King Jr knew that war creates confusion and that his audiences mind was boggled with questions. Please enter the email address that you use to login to TeenInk.com, and we'll email you instructions to reset your password. For example, this quote personifies war as being an enemy. Favorite Quote:Make as many as mistakes as you want, just don't make the same mistake. He says, And we must rejoice as well, for surely this is the first time in our nation's history that a significant number of its religious leaders have chosen to move beyond the prophesying of smooth patriotism to the high grounds of a firm dissent based upon the mandates of conscience and the reading of history. With an urgent tone, he repeats the phrase, we must speak (4), several times. King Jr delivered his "Beyond Vietnam -- A Time to Break Silence" in 1967 in NewYork City. Rhetorical Analysis of MLK's Speech "Beyond Vietnam". Luther was a charismatic leader who took a firm stand against the oppressive and racist regime of the United States (US), devoting much of his life towards uniting the segregated African-American community of the US. Hence, Kings works always had the recurring theme of the unity and strength of combined willpower. By repeating the phrase, "for the sake," he creates a rhythmic flow that causes his audience to be more receptive to his idea. Along with, and the almost facile connection between the war in Vietnam, First, Martin Luther King Jr. uses emotional appeals to persuade his audience that the Vietnam War is unjust because it is unfairly killing the poor and its destroying the country. So far we may have killed a million of them, mostly children (King). https://nolongerinvisiblemen.wordpress.com/2014/11/11/sparknotes-for-martin-luther-king-jr-s-a-time-to-break-silence/, https://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/mlkatimetobreaksilence.htm, Microsoft Corporation SWOT Analysis (2016), Zora Neale Hurstons Their Eyes were watching God: Analysis. Which of your works would you like to tell your friends about? Rhetorical Mlk Speech "Beyond Vietnam". 4 May. Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam A Time To Break Silence In the speech "Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence," by Martin Luther King Jr. he expresses his opinion on how the Vietnam war is unjust. His audience at Riverside Church, likely familiar with his Civil Rights work, would most likely than view him with more credibility because they too could sympathize to an injustice done by the American government. In this way, he personifies war as a demon that consumes people's lives and a nation's valuable resources which would otherwise be happy if it was not being ruined by bombs and bullets. Need a custom essay sample written specially to meet your He also says the war is further crippling the poor in the United States by sending a disproportional number of them to the front lines to die. This quote causes the audience to realize the contradiction in the Vietnam war policy, making them less likely to accept. Comparing the Justice System during the 1960s to a corrupt bank allows the audience to connect to what Dr. King is saying. All rights reserved. King is effectively able to convey his point about his topic by using rhetorical devices such as logos, ethos, pathos. Furthermore the Kings parallel structure clarifies and highlights his intent by building up to a more important point. King argues that all people are created equal and directly challenged the outdated and abhorrent views that upheld the false flag of racial superiority among White Americans. He also makes an emotional plea by vividly describing the conditions in Vietnam. He offers many practical reasons for the opposition, as well as spiritual and moral reasons. In multiple paragraphs of his speech, King effectively appeals to emotion by using personal anecdotes that involve him speaking to people of poverty directly. For instance, he does when he depicts the, "Negro and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same schools." More importantly, King states that, the poor has been manipulated into believing a type of reality that simply isnt accurate or fair on their part. Rhetorical Analysis, Martin Luther King Rhetorical Devices Analysis, Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King Jr.S Speech, A Rhetorical Analysis Journey Through Martin Luther King Jr.s SpeechI Have a Dream. This makes the irony explicit and that Vietnam being a smaller and weaker nation was being made to face injustice which it never deserved or desired. This use of repetitive language conveys urgency and shows that he deeply believes the churches may influence the government if they speak against the war. Favorite Quote:Failures help one grow as a person. Overall, Martin Luther King Jr. eloquently argues against the United States involvement in Vietnam through his use of parallelism, diction, and imagery. Ironic elements are evident in abundance throughout Kings speech which elicit an comical tone and draws on the reality of the war. King spoke for the weak that did not have the voices to speak for themselves; for example, he represented the poor. This is an attempt to connect with the audiences emotions and prove that the war was imposed on them and even if politicians call it patriotic, society and people would never love war. Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task. King makes the nation appears as hypocrites because Americans pretend to fight as a united nation whereas segregation is among the same schools, the same neighborhood, the same country. His masterful delivery of these metaphors and the frequent repetition makes the speech much like a poem or a part of a song. These statements serve to communicate to the audience that the speaker is someone of authority and should be listened to. In his speech, Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence Martin Luther King Jr., uses appeals to emotion, appeals to credibility, and powerful diction to strengthen his argument and persuade his audience that the Vietnam War is unjust. Ethos, the appeal to the legitimacy and authority of the speaker, is used throughout the speech. This quote is referencing how poor and rich people were drafted to war but the poor people had no one left to support the family. This convinces the reader to fully consider how the war has brought detrimental consequences, and through Kings diction, he is capable of convincing his audience to, When speaking about how the war had initially seem to have brought opportunities, he says, Then came the buildup in Vietnam, and I watched this program broken and eviscerated, as if it were some idle political plaything of a society gone mad on war, and I knew that America would never invest the necessary funds or energies in rehabilitation of its poor. Evidently, the program for the poor was meant to be used in helping the poor, but as soon as the funds were directed to the Vietnam War, resources were no longer cast in their direction. For these practical and logical reasons, the church should join the opposition. Martin Luther King, Jr in his speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence argued that US foreign policy was hypocritical when compared to the inequality present in the United States. He does it to engage peoples imagination and to awaken their consciences. Registration number: 419361 When he argues that the war's immoral nature should be "incandescently clear," he implies to his audience that those who do not voice their opinion against the war are not concerned for, "the integrity and life of America.". In 1967, Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his speech Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence. In the speech, King argues against American involvement in the Vietnam War and explains why he cannot remain silent. Despite criticism from speaking out about things other than civil rights, King uses syntax, rhetorical strategies, and appeals to . Here, at ACaseStudy.com, we deliver professionally written papers, and the best grades for you from your professors are guaranteed! At last the paper discusses and assesses how to what an extent Kings dream came true with self-elected sources as backrest for the asses. A comment like this doesnt leave the reader unmoved. This quote is referencing how poor and rich people were drafted to war but the poor people had no one left to support the family. Luthers speech was a passionate rhetoric that preached his views about the future. These arguments work because they point out that even though the war is not happening on our soil, it is having a devastating effect here, especially in poor areas where people cannot afford to be hindered any more than they already are. All of Dr. Kings arguments are very effective. Lastly, Martin Luther King uses logos in his famous speech. Additionally, Kings statement that Southeast Asia is eight thousand miles away strengthens the irony by making Southeast Asia seem like a place which is completely disconnected from America. He then paints a picture of the suffering endured by Vietnam and tells how the United States has a long history of doing the wrong thing to this tiny country. The line, For the sake of those boys, for the sake of this government, for the sake of the hundreds of thousands trembling under our violence, I cannot be silent, demonstrates how King uses parallelism. Issues have been resolved because now the draft is less common because more people volunteer for war so the poor are not forced. All of the valid arguments and vivid imagery Dr. King uses combine to make this a very effective, passionate and memorable speech. The persuasive techniques utilized by King Jr are aimed at making people think over the outcomes of Vietnam war and if it was not against Americas integrity. Dr. King plainly states his purpose near the beginning of his speech. He quotes Langston Hughes, in his speech to establish a connection between the struggle for civil liberty in United States and the oppression in Vietnam. For instance, he starts by stating the effects of the Vietnam War forced the American poverty program: "experiments, hopes, new beginnings." The war with Vietnam was just as unjust as unnecessary. As he notes towards the end of his speech, "If we will make the right choice, we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our world into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood ". Analyzes how john kerry's "beyond vietnam- a time to break silence" by martin luther king jr. uses rhetorical devices that emphasize the importance and meaning of his speech. Pathos is a method applied to represent an appeal to feelings and emotions in a speech and other various kinds of writing. The war lasted from 1955 to 1975.The nation as a whole began to uproar over the war and the major consequences of the war. Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King's "Beyond Vietnam: a Time to A few lines after, King writes about the injustice the African-American community has faced, by stating, We were taking the black young men who had been crippled by our society and sending them eight thousand miles away to guarantee liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found in southwest Georgia and East Harlem. To further show to the audience how his community has been suffering from the war, he uses a comparison statement between the facts to illustrate how freedom has been hard to attain. His speech emphasizes at transitioning from war to peace and from violence to a nonviolent and peaceful society. This comparison is very sobering. Titled as the I Have a Dream Speech, he read this speech to the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. At the heart of their concerns, this query has often loomed large and loud: Why are you speaking about the war, Dr. King? Why are you joining the voices of dissent?(King). Martin Luther King Jr. was a social activist that led the Civil Rights Movement, and other movements until his assassination in 1968. Martin Luther King Jr. Src: Pixabay Read a rhetorical analysis of Martin Luther King Jr's Beyond Vietnam: Time to break silence. Moreover, it is the poor and the helpless mainly who are falling prey to this war game. "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence" is an article written by Martin Luther King Jr himself. On April 4, 1967, King addressed a crowd of 3,000 in Riverside Church by delivering a speech titled, "Beyond Vietnam," in the midst of the cruelty of the Vietnam War. Recognizing that citizens in poverty were not able to support their families while away from home at war, Martin Luther King included that war [and being enlisted in battle was] an enemy of poor to demonstrate how even though any man could be drafted, the economically stable left behind support for their family while the impoverished were ineligible of doing so (Source A). He is using historical facts to create a parallel between the current situation and the past. In addition, his use of parallelism allows him to appeal to his audiences pity for the oppressed in order for him to express his call to action, a call for activism that goes beyond Vietnam. Acting almost as a climax, King lyrically urges his audience to voice their opinions and wage a war against this unjustified war in Vietnam. Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King Beyond Vietnam 534 Words | 3 Pages In 1967, Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his speech "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence." In the speech, King argues against American involvement in the Vietnam War and explains why he cannot remain silent. However, the persuasiveness of his speeches does not come solely from his ability to connect with his audience's emotions but from an extraordinary ability to reason and validate his point. Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King's "Beyond Vietnam - StudyMode Rhetorical Mlk Speech "Beyond Vietnam" - GradesFixer In other words, the resources were used for the soldiers, yet the poor still needed them just as so. Please note that while we value your input, we cannot respond to every message. The war was only going to consume lives and resources. He does not want the church leaders to simply listen to his message. He includes various perspectives and addresses several counterarguments with the intention to prove the futility of war as a tool to address social, economic and political problems. (These links will automatically appear in your email.). Copyright 2023 IPL.org All rights reserved. This paper examines the conditions of the Afro-Americans lives from 1960-today with focus on education, work, income, police brutality and criminality. To start, Dr. Kings use of metaphors allows his audience to understand his viewpoint better. King calms the African Americans who are being oppressed by using the words, this situation can and will be changed. and Let us not wallow in the valley of despair. which gives them hope that there will be a new day when a change will take place. King uses personal anecdotes, elaborate word choice, and reliable facts to persuade his audience of the injustice of the war. He also reminds the church leaders of something seemingly obvious that they may have lost sight of: the Father is deeply concerned especially for his suffering and helpless and outcast children (13). 2 February 2013. Thank you! Furthermore, such a vivid picture will linger permanently in the audiences mind, which will make them think about the terrible outcome in the future. Many great speeches are increasingly different. He talks about the innocent people killed in the crossfire, mostly children. Encompassed within this quote is pathos because the harsh accusation leads the reader to think poorly of the government while pitying the poor. He expresses that the first step toward equality as the earth moving and nations running with fear. Let us not wallow in the valley of despair. (King). Manacles of discrimination, Lonely island of poverty and Chains of discrimination paint a bleak picture of life as a minority in America, and contrasts phrases such as Bright day of justice and Sacred obligation which symbolize freedom. It is why while he attacks America's intervention in Vietnam on the one hand, on the other he brings people's attention towards the other side of life where America can become a beacon of hope and peace for the entire world including Vietnam. He is disappointed in te church and his disappointment is worse because he feels so strongly for the church, as is evident through his tears. King was really able to speak to his audience by using evidence, reasoning, and a persuasive writing style throughout his speech. 838 Words He says, To me the relationship of this ministry to the making of peace is so obvious that I sometimes marvel at those who ask me why Im speaking against the war (12). King uses personal anecdotes, elaborate word choice, and reliable facts to persuade his audience of the injustice of the war. War is expensive. Dr. King's purpose is . Read More Use Of Nonviolence In Cesar Chavez's Speech 409 Words | 2 Pages Martin Luther King Jr. was extremely passionate about nonviolence. How Does Martin Luther King Use Rhetorical Devices Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam By Martin Luther King Martin Luther King Jr is an African American preacher and civil rights activist that along with every other African American male and female in 1976 was waging a war in America for their not-so-natural born rights. On April 4, 1967, Martin Luther King delivered his first major public statement against the Vietnam War, entitled "Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break the Silence." Addressing a crowd of 3,000 at Riverside Church in New York City, King condemned the war as anti-democratic, impractical, and unjust. Read a rhetorical analysis of Martin Luther King Jr's Beyond Vietnam: Time to break silence. Rhetorical Analysis Of Mlk's Beyond Vietnam - 419 Words | Cram Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/rhetorical-analysis-of-martin-luther-kings-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence/, Rhetorical of Analysis of Martin Luther Kings, I Have a Dream Speech, Break, Break, Break by Alfred Lord Tennyson Analysis, Martin Luther King Jr.: A Civil Rights Activist Who Changed, Rhetorical Analysis Martin Luther King Jr. versus Malcolm X, Martin Luther King Jr. Rhetorical Analysis Pearl Harbor Speech - 519 Words | Cram For example, he says that if Americas soul becomes totally poisoned, part of the autopsy must read: Vietnam. King uses this metaphor to establish the potentially dreadful consequences of America continuing to fight the war. Recognizing that citizens in poverty were not able to support their families while away from home at war, Martin Luther King included that war [and being enlisted in battle was] an enemy of poor to demonstrate how even though any man could be drafted, the economically stable left behind support for their family while the impoverished were ineligible of doing so (Source A). A lot of parts from Martin Luther Kings dream have come true, but it is still not all that is how King wanted it to be. The most famous speeches in the United States history all have utilized rhetoric devices and strategies. Martin Luther King Jr. applies imagery throughout his speech in order to illustrate the horrors of the war to arouse anger at its atrocities and injustice. Here, Martin Luther King Jr is getting the audience emotionally and completely invested by showing the effect of America in Vietnam on their lives. His use of diction and imagery arouses anger while increasing his credibility since he criticizes the unjust war he describes. Martin Luther King notes that we have been repeatedly faced with the cruel irony of watching Negro and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same schools (King). "The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis." In a similar light, King addressed the speech I have a dream to a peaceful mass gathering in Washington asking for change. Overall, Martin Luther King Jr. eloquently argues against the United States involvement in Vietnam through his use of parallelism, diction, and imagery. Thank you for sharing this page with a friend! Overall, Martin Luther King Jr. eloquently argues against the United States involvement in Vietnam through his use of parallelism, diction, and imagery. Through utilising figurative language to juxtapose optimistic progress and demonic destruction, King is able to emphasise how devastating the Vietnam War is. 350 5th Ave, New York, NY 10118, USA. Through his use of imagery, diction, and parallel structure, Martin Luther King Jr associates the war in Vietnam with injustice in his famous speech, "Beyond Vietnam - A Time to Break Silence.". Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King's Beyond Vietnam Rhetorical devices are included in Martin Luther Kings speeches to prove conflict. Beyond Vietnam: A Rhetorical Analysis . down the pipe, "I watched this program broken and eviscerated" through the "buildup in Vietnam,". In conclusion, Martin Luther King, Jr uses ethos, pathos, and logos, among other rhetorical devices, to support his argument that American policy in Vietnam was inconsistent with its treatment of African-Americans in the United States. * Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document, American Women Struggle in the 20th Century, Charlottesville Tragedy: Racial Issue in the USA, Prison Staffing and Correctional Officers Duties, Gender Issues in the Us Correctional System. In Dr. Martin Luther King's speech "Beyond VietnamA Time to Break Silence" (1967), Dr. King asserts that the war in Vietnam is totally immoral and has far reaching negative implications not only for Vietnam, but for The United States and the rest of the World as well.
Brooke Posch Wedding, Darrell Scott Columbine, Articles B